To what extent is there disagreement

Herodotus stretched his history back beyond living memory and famously reported hearsay as evidence. The role of ideology and politics Disagreements can also be more overtly ideological in character.

It is not simply that evidence based on new research superseded evidence based on old research. Others, such as Richard Evans in his In Defence of History have directly countered the arguments of what is known as perhaps unhelpfully now postmodernism and defended the status of historical writing.

Very crudely, classical Marxism carries within it a view that history has a particular trajectory or direction and will end at a finite point, even if we cannot have advance knowledge of when and precisely how this will come about. Thucydides would have none of this. Questions of the selection and relevance of evidence The method and the techniques of history Ideology and political predisposition The purpose for which history is studied in the first place More recently, arguments about the validity of historical method Selection and interpretation of evidence At the level of primary research and evidence, historians often find different evidence on the same subject.

This will become clearer if we flip back two-and-a-half millennia to the men generally regarded as the first two historians. Given this, disagreement was inevitable. One example is the debate over the extent and rate of economic growth in England during the industrial revolution.

This is accounted for in a much more disciplined, methodical and constrained way. In spite of this underlying similarity, the differences between them were profound.

There are a number of different sources of disagreement involved here. Focus and aim We should be very cautious, however, about assuming the real root of disagreement among historians lies in the clash of modern political ideologies or the philosophical and methodological disputes associated with postmodernism.

His interests were vast, taking in what we would now call geography, natural history and anthropology as well as history.

Writing in the fifth century BC, both Herodotus and Thucydides took the origins and course of war as their subject. In some areas of historical inquiry new information causes new conclusions to be drawn and that evidence as well as those conclusions is then contested.

His views of the cause of events in general reflected a more systematic understanding of the structures of politics and human motivation. On matters of evidence they were also at odds.

They argued that, amongst other things, the industrial revolution was a phenomenon of regional development, therefore hard to study through the national aggregate statistics used by earlier historians.

Moreover, the narratives they produce are simply that:Freedom, To An Extent Essay; Freedom, To An Extent Essay. Words 4 Pages “We have learned to live in a world where ‘reality’ is a matter of choice.” While choosing what we feel is real is based on what we actually want to see.

To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively the constitution protects freedom Words. There is some confusion among the IELTS test takers with regards to the proper approach or writing style for two similar, but different discussion instructions.

They normally find it difficult to tell the difference between an "agree or disagree" and an "to what extent do you agree or disagree" essay.

There are a number of different sources of disagreement involved here. It is not simply that evidence based on new research superseded evidence based on old research.

At any given point in the debate, new data redefines the issue (such as putting the focus on the region) and this often opens the possibility of re-interpreting the existing as.

To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively the constitution protects freedom? There is a small amount of disagreement over whether or not the US constitution protects freedom for the average American citizen – whilst many Americans feel that the constitution formally protects their liberties (for example: the first.

To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively the constitution protects freedom?

Why Do Historians Disagree?

There is a small amount of disagreement over whether or not the US constitution protects freedom for the average American citizen – whilst many Americans feel that the constitution formally protects their liberties (for example: the first.

Transcript of To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively t.

To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively the constitution protects freedom? define what is meant by freedom (freedom enjoyed by citizens under the constitution).

Download
To what extent is there disagreement
Rated 0/5 based on 36 review